Codex Vitae: Religion

While I’m not religious, I do think that understanding religion is important. Religion’s importance to me stems from the reason that it exists. As a species, humans are different from other creatures because of the fact that we alone seek causes for things. We seek to explain the world around us; to date, we have found no other life form that does so. As Maria Konnikova of The New Yorker notes:

The human mind is incredibly averse to uncertainty and ambiguity; from an early age, we respond to uncertainty or lack of clarity by spontaneously generating plausible explanations… In 1972, the psychologist Jerome Kagan posited that uncertainty resolution was one of the foremost determinants of our behavior. When we can’t immediately gratify our desire to know, we become highly motivated to reach a concrete explanation… We want, in other words, to achieve “cognitive closure.”

Religion offers human beings an explanatory system for the natural phenomena that they would not otherwise be able to explain. It is for this reason that we see flood stories from civilizations across the planet: the Biblical account of “Noah’s Ark”, the Greek myth of Deucalion, the Hindu story of Manu and the fish and the Babylonian tale of Utnapishtim from the Epic of Gilgamesh, to name a few. Flood stories exist because of the nature of floods themselves. Ancient civilizations tended to center on rivers and could not expand too far beyond them due to the limits of irrigation technology; thus, the bounds of the “known world” were constrained. When the rivers flooded, it seemed like they would flood the whole world. Of course, while floods can bring life (as in Egypt), they can also be wildly destructive. Ancient peoples sought an explanation for this destruction.

Dr. Tania Lombrozo from Berkeley says that “people prefer explanations that provide a function or purpose, called ‘teleological explanations.’ If I ask, for instance, ‘why does your cup have a handle?’ a teleological explanations might be, ‘The cup has a handle so that you can lift it without burning your fingers.'” Floods, teleologically explained, happen to smite people’s wickedness and cause rebirth per various religions.

This brings me to my main point: religion is important to understand because people use it to describe the world. While you or I might not subscribe to those belief systems, understanding others’ religions gives us a view into understanding them. My favorite theory of how one might reconcile various religions is recounted here by Jack Preston King.

Simply put:

All of Humanity is climbing the same Holy Mountain. It’s a big enough mountain that the landscape and the weather are different depending on which side you’re climbing. It’s so wide at the base that you have to have ascended quite a distance to even become aware you’re on a mountain with more than one side, that you’re climbing something other than a flat, vertical plane. At the top of the mountain is a Great Truth that is calling us all toward it.

The maps up the mountain are religions. They appear shockingly different due to the conditions different spiritual cartographers face. Different histories, cultures, and other factors all lead to different maps. Most importantly, though, is that each mapmaker’s truth is true from the perspective of the map and path they’re following.

While we’re on one side or another of the mountain, we’re stuck with a limited view, and we squabble over particulars. At the summit, that just won’t happen, for reasons that will make perfect sense when we get there, but not a moment before. It [The Holy Mount metaphor] suggests that perceived contradictions are only apparent, the result of drawing short-sighted conclusions before we’ve gathered all the relevant evidence. When the day comes that we do, in fact, “know it all” (instead of merely pretending to), we’ll all agree on everything.


  1. Not that I disagree with anything you said here, but I must say I was surprised to read this take on religion considering some of the other views you have expressed. I definitely see the merit in understanding religion as a way of understanding people, but do you not also see it as a dangerous construction that must eventually be diminished if the human race is to avoid self-destructive conflict?

    1. Hi Matt,

      That’s a great question and I’m glad you asked. While I personally hope that we move to a more secular world, I think that religion will remain a powerful force as long as there are people who crave salvation and see no clear way out of their struggles. For example, the desperately poor, the disabled, the embattled, etc. see religion as a higher-order narrative that gives structure to their lives. It gives them a sense of purpose; it prevents their suffering from seeming like the pointless result of a cruel and uncaring world.

      I think that organized religion can create great harms in the world (Crusades, Jihadism, etc.), but on an individual level people should be left alone to their self-directed spirituality if they so choose. Unfortunately, I don’t think we’ll get to a majority secular world for a long time (likely after my lifetime), so I make do with understanding the choices of others as the next best option. Does that make sense?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.